mUltimate Chopin

WN 29, Waltz in E minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 124

composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor

No marks in PE1 (→GE)

Wedges in PE2 (→PE3→PE4)
..

The wedges for the 1st crotchet were most probably overlooked by PE1 (→GE), which was rectified by adding them in PE2 (→PE3→PE4). Cf. the note on / below.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Wedges , Errors in PE , Revisions in #PE

b. 125-127

composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor

L.H. accents in PE, contextual interpretation

R.H. accents in GE
..

Assigning the accents to the R.H. part must be a mistake by the engraver of GE. Although the version of PE is not clear from the graphical point of view, the natural addressee of these accents are the distinct L.H. minims resulting from syncopation.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in PE

b. 128

composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor

No mark in sources

Accent suggested by the editors
..

In the main text we suggest adding an accent after the previous 3 bars. The absence of the mark is probably an oversight by the engraver, who overlooked it in a new line.

category imprint: Editorial revisions