



Pitch
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
FE and EE have no sharps returning f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC and EE1 (→EE2) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC and EE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The seventh in GC is certainly erroneous, however, without comparing it to other sources, it is unclear whether the mistake concerns the bottom or top note. It is proved by the way the place was revised in GE1. In the main text we give the undoubtedly correct text of FE, EE and GE2 (→GE3).
We add cautionary sharps before F category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC, FE and EE there are no accidentals before the 9th quaver, so it is not entirely clear whether it is to be read as e In EE1 the top note of the part of the R.H. is mistakenly written as d3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of GC |