mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Pitch
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Pitch

b. 410

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In FE, sharps before the a​​​​​​​ notes are present only in the R.H. part. The inaccuracy was corrected in the remaining editions.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 414

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In GE3, the repeated chords were written in an abbreviated manner as a crotchet with semiquaver tremolo.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 420

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In the L.H. part, there are erroneous c​​​​​​​2-b1 semiquavers in GE1. A similar mistake was present also in FE; however, it was corrected therein, probably in the last phase of proofreading. The subsequent GE contain the correct text.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE

b. 421

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

The cautionary ​​​​​​​ before a1 was probably added in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE), since it is absent in GE1 (→GE2). The accidental was added in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 429

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

b in FE (→EE) & GE3

d1 in GE1 (→GE2)
..

The version of GE1 (→GE2), distorting the sequence of bass (implemented by cellos and double basses), must be erroneous. However, the traces of proofreading visible in FE prove that it was the engraver of this edition that committed a mistake, yet in GE1 the note was revised by adding an admittedly overlooked ​​​​​​​, while in FE (→EE) it was moved to the right pitch. The correct version was introduced also in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE