



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The articulation detail written in A could have been overlooked in FE. In spite of this, we prefer the notation of the editions, as in analogous situation in bar 57 Chopin already did not mark the separation of the bass note. The fingering also does not suggest an interruption of the passage's continuity. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The accent of A could have been overlooked in FE (→GE,EE), therefore, in the main text we give it in brackets. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In EE4 a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 19-23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
For each source we give the pairs of hairpins appearing under similar figures in the L.H. in the unified version. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |