



Pitch
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
On the basis of the photocopy of A we have at our disposal, it is difficult to state whether on the 2nd and 3rd crotchets in bar 19 Chopin wanted to have a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Accompaniment changes |
||||||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
In this bar, the differences between the presentation autographs and the final version result from the need for a smooth transition with the next bar, in which Chopin used a different version of accompaniment, while writing autographs-gifts and yet another one, while preparing the Waltz for print. Therefore, the presented variants may be rationally used only with a corresponding version of bars 21-24. The notation of As is problematic, as Chopin did not write a version of bar 20 which would combine with the tenor-linear version of the L.H., written in the sketch as second and adopted in our reconstruction of As – see bars 21-24 – at all. We assume that the situation implies repetition of the version of bars 9, 11 and 18.
Moreover, it seems to be incomprehensible why the correction of the version of As, which is clear in A, was not initially included by the engraver of FE neither in this bar nor in its repetition in the reprise, as a result of which it had to be redone in the proofreading of this edition. It suggests adding changes in A already after having engraved FE, probably at the time of proofreading. Cf. Polonaise in E category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||
b. 21-23
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
Already in As, Chopin wrote two versions of accompaniment in these bars and in bar 24, however, it is not clear how he planned to use them. Eventually, in all later sources they were used to diversify the repeating figures through differentiation of the part of the L.H. in bars 21-24 and 29-32. The presentation autographs and the published version differ, however, in the order of appearance of both versions – apart from minor details, AI, AII and AIII first include the "tenor" version, which in A (→FE→GE,EE) appears only as the second.
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , Accompaniment changes |
||||||||||||
b. 21-23
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
Chopin did not pay special attention to cautionary flats before the e category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Chopin's hesitations , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||||||
b. 21-23
|
composition: Op. 64 No 1, Waltz in D♭ major
..
The part of the R.H. in bars 21 and 23 is written in As in two versions of an unidentified purpose. In the suggested reconstruction of the sketch we place the original, six-quaver version for the first time (bars 21 and 23), whereas the later, which starting from the presentation autographs became the only one, for the second time (bars 29 and 31). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Main-line changes |