



Pitch
b. 165-168
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE), fully analogous with the corresponding fragment of the recapitulation (bars 315-318), was introduced by Chopin in the proofreading of FE1. Both versions are, according to us, musically equal, yet showing respect for Chopin's decision, in the main text we give the later, proofread version. The reason for the change could have been pianistic convenience – following the proofreading, the number of differences between the subsequent appearances of similar two-bar phrases in bars 165-166, 167-168, 315-316 and 317-318 was significantly reduced. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 168
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The natural before the 2nd quaver in the L.H. (d), overlooked in A (→GE1→FE), was added in EE and GE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 169-170
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The flats restoring e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accidental before the antepenultimate semiquaver contributes to a certain obscurity concerning Chopin's intention. Although the official rule of validity of accidentals was the same as today, he would often use them as valid not only at their absolute pitch, but also in other octaves. However, in this case E category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves |
||||||
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |