



Pitch
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The wedge written in the part of the R.H. in A was reproduced in GE (→FE→EE) as a dot and another one was added in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||
b. 249
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The erroneous pitch of the 2nd semiquaver in GE is a consequence of the imprecise notation of the end of the octave sign embracing the first two semiquavers in this bar in A (and the last four of the previous one). In GE1 the notation was reproduced too literally (erroneously), not taking into account both the graphical context and analogous figures in the next bars. The mistake was not repeated in FE (→EE), although the notation of EE is not entirely clear. In turn, the misunderstanding of Chopin's intention in GE2 is puzzling, in which the erroneous pitch of the discussed note was repeated, although the notation does not include an octave sign. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 249
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The sources feature a rather unnecessary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Cautionary accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 250
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we omit the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |