Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Rhythm
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Rhythm

b. 221

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No slur in A (→GEFE)

Slur in EE

..

The missing slur embracing the group of small notes is to be, according to us, regarded as an inaccuracy. Therefore, in the main text we give the slur – analogous with bar 219 – added in EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 224

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

c2 repeated in A

c2 tied in GE (→FEEE)

..

Together with the change of accentuation Chopin changed in the proofreading of GE (→FEEE) also the rhythm: the last crotchet in the 1st half of the bar was sustained and a possible quintuplet of semiquavers was divided into a triplet and a pair of common semiquavers. The change, similarly as in the case of the accents, constitutes the final stage of rhythmic transformations, since the traces of corrections in A prove the existence of an already earlier version.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 224

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

ctied in A (1 tie)

ctied in GE1 (2 ties)

crepeated in FE (→EE) & GE2

..

The tie of c1, written in A in accordance with Chopin's habit as a short curved line before the second of the sustained notes, was reproduced accurately in GE1. However, the notation is illegible in print, hence most probably Chopin added a second longer curved line in the proofreading. The notation, which should be clear for anyone who saw A, turned out to be incomprehensible both for the engraver of FE (→EE) and – surprisingly – for the reviser of GE2. As a consequence, despite two ties, the cnote is not sustained in those editions.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 224

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

The notation of the harmonic legato (holding elements of chords with fingers), very detailed in A, was reproduced in the editions inaccurately. A fragment of the stem combining the notes of the a-cthird was not included and the stem extending the first fwas overlooked. As far as the mentioned third is concerned, the notation of A may be theoretically interpreted twofold: with a ccrotchet or with an a-ccrotchet. In this context, it is, however, clear that the bass note is also to be extended.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 247-248

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

Chopin shortened the initially written gminims in the violin part, replacing them with crotchets and rests. He also shortened b minims in cellos in a similar manner as well as modified the slur in the 1st violin part accordingly. 

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A