



Page:
Source:
p. 7, b. 195-210
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
copy link
Main text

The fact of leaving the first two semiquavers of the passage outside of the slur is almost certainly an inaccuracy of notation – cf. analogous bar 209. The missing slur in GE3 is probably a revision – this edition omitted all slurs in the R.H. in bars 203-210.
See b. 203
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, GE2, FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, Atut, GE2a, FEFo