



Slurs
b. 456-457
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The notation of the sources suggests that the slurs reach only the bottom note of the g category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 459-460
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In analogous bars 467-468, the slur in a pianistically identical situation is led to the beginning of the bar. Therefore, it is likely that one of the versions is inaccurate. A longer slur is supported by the slur in the L.H., while a shorter slur could be justified by the presence of category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 460
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 461
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A comparison with similar motifs suggests that the slur encompassing the entire figure in this bar is probably inaccurate. It was deemed as such already in EE and GE3, which replaced it with a shorter one, probably modelled after the previous bar. In the main text, we give a slur reaching the topmost note of the bar, most frequent in analogous bars in the sources. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 462
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur must be an oversight. The slur was added in EE, yet it encompasses only the semiquaver triplet (its range is not entirely clear – the slur reaches slightly further than a similar slur in the previous bar). In the main text, we add a slur encompassing the entire figure like in the majority of analogous figures. The same slur was added also in GE3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |