



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 351
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
GE2 omitted a staccato dot to B in the L.H. – certainly an engraver's oversight. The mark was added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 375-396
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||||
b. 411
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing staccato dot is an oversight of the engravers of FE and GE. It was only GE3 that noticed the mark in FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 413-435
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The accents written in A in b. 413, 415 and analog. mean almost certainly the same despite differences, generally minor ones, in length and shape. The majority of the marks is rather short; however, four (b. 417, 425, 433 and 435) are definitely long, which makes us provide the main text with long accents only. At the same time, we add the accents Chopin overlooked in b. 419 and 431. We consider the version of GE2 (→GE3) with a complete set of short accents to be an alternative solution. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||||||||
b. 427
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |