Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 547

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Accent in A (→FC,FEEE) & GE2 (→GE3)

No mark in GE1

..

GE1 features only one accent in this bar, placed between the staves, closer to the L.H. part. Therefore, we assume that it is a L.H. accent, which means no accent for the R.H.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 548-551

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

4 accents in A & GE2 (→GE3)

3 accents in FC

No marks in FE (→EE) & GE1

..

Four accents under the bass octaves were not reproduced in such a form in any of the remaining sources. While GE2 (→GE3) contains all accents, they are placed above the octaves, which is a revision of the text of GE1 on the basis of a comparison with FC and unification by analogy (an accent was added in b. 551, which is absent in FC).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of FC

b. 573-576

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No marks in FC (→GE)

..

A missing accent at the beginning of each of these 4 bars may be an oversight of Fontana. According to us, it is, however, more likely that Chopin added the accents in A after FC had already been prepared.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Corrections in A , Errors of FC

b. 573-576

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No marks in FE (→EE)

..

In the main text we give 6 staccato dots, written in A over the 3-crotchet motifs. The absence of the dots in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight; the engraver could have been misled by the placement of the dots in A, i.e. close to the dashes marking the range of calando. In turn, it is unclear how the missing dots in b. 574 and 576 in GE are to be explained, since one can imagine both an oversight and a revision. However, there is no doubt that the doubled marks under the notes are a revision. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 579-580

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

2 staccato dots in A (→FC)

No marks in FE (→EE)

4 staccato dots in GE

3 staccato dots, our alternative suggestion

..

In the main text we preserve the version of A (→FC), since there are no indications that Chopin was removing dots in FE or adding them in GE. However, it is uncertain whether the missing dot in b. 580 was intentional, since the bar opens a new line of text, which would often contribute to various inaccuracies of notation.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions