



Ornaments
b. 286
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The absence of the mark in EE1 is most probably an oversight of the engraver, corrected in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in analogous b. 55, it seems unlikely that Chopin would have wanted to forgo an arpeggio in this figure. The missing arpeggio in FE could be explained by an oversight in the basis or by it having been entered into [A] after [FC] (→FE) had been finished. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 289-293
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The trills in b. 289 and 293 are written down in GE without a wavy line after the category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with analogous b. 31, the slur of GE, although formally correct, is most probably inaccurate and marks a grace note and an arpeggio (written down as a vertical slur), as was conveyed in FE. The absence of a slur (arpeggio) in EE, whatever the reason, cannot be authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 292
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 59, in the main text we add an arpeggio on the basis of a comparison with b. 33 and 109. category imprint: Editorial revisions |