



b. 664
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Chopin added the category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 664-665
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
According to Chopin, these bars were supposed to be an exact repetition of b. 213-214. Therefore, in the main text we give the dolce indication in b. 664, in accordance with the Chopinesque entry in b. 213 in FC (→GE1). In subsequent GE the indication was arbitrarily moved to b. 665, probably by analogy with b. 81-82. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 664-665
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 665-666
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering in FED quite significantly differs from the other entries in this copy in terms of size and font, so it seems that it could not have been written by Chopin or Miss O'Meara. In spite of that, the fingering is practically identical with the one that Chopin wrote above a similar sequence of chromatic fourths in the copy of the Grand Duo Concertant, Dbop. 29 belonging to Miss Forest. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 666-669
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we reproduce the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |