mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 683

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary ​​​​​​​ before d. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 683-695

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

In both manuscripts these bars are written in an abridged manner as repetition of b. 232-244.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Abbreviated notation of A

b. 683-695

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No markings in A (→FE→EE)

Pedalling in FC (→GE)
..

In the main text we give the pedalling written by Chopin in FC (→GE) in b. 232-244, of which the discussed bars are a repetition. It is only b. 686-687 that we discuss separately, in which the composer probably overlooked a necessary pedal change.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 683-685

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No signs in A (→FE→EE)

  in FC (→GE1)

  in GE2 (→GE3)
..

In the main text we give the   marks written by Chopin in FC (→GE1) in b. 232-234, of which the discussed bars are a repetition. Just like there, the  sign was arbitrarily moved by GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 684

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

a2 in chord in A (→FC→GE)

No a2 in chord in FE (→EE)
..

The version of FE must be a result of an overlooked note by the engraver, who was less careful this time (analogous b. 233 was reproduced correctly in FE, on the basis of the same notation of A).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE