



b. 90
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
This four-quaver motif, which opens the Sonata, appears in the entire movement 10 more times (bars 1-2, 5, 7, 92, 94, 179-180, 183 and 185), always accompanied by category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors of A |
|||||
b. 91
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we omit the inauthentic R.H. part fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 91-93
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
When interpreted literally, the A slur in the 2nd half of bar 91 starts from the semiquaver; the same applies to bar 93. Due to the notation of similar motifs in bars 98-99, we favour the interpretation adopted by the editions (cf. the similarly shifted slur over the dots in bar 41). The A version can be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 94
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
As in bar 59 and 66, in the main text we simplify the Chopinesque notation after similar bar 90 and 92. The original notation can be a remaining element of the abandoned version featuring a repetition of the chord on the 4th crotchet in the bar. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 96
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
As Chopin wrote the top voice quavers first, there was no space left for the minim prolonging the sound of the first one. He wrote it only under c2, as the natural and the notehead of the b1 quaver made it impossible to place it closer to the 1st quaver. This misleading notation, suggesting that a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context issues: Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Errors repeated in IE |