



b. 352
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The second slur in the bottom voice is barely visible in A – the beginning blends in with the stave, while the ending is probably inaccurate, as there is no reason for the range of these two slurs to differ. Due to the above, in the main text we standardise them after the first one. In GE (→FE,EE) it was only the first slur that was reproduced (inaccurately). In IE in the 2nd half of the bar a slur modelled after the 1st half was added. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , |
|||||||||||
b. 353
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A there is no accidental to the last R.H. note. Chopin's inaccuracy was corrected in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 355
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A Chopin forgot to write a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A |
|||||||||||
b. 356-357
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The absence of the slurs in the editions is due to the carelessness of the engraver of GE, who either overlooked or omitted the slurs, which are difficult to engrave (in the original notation with the use of an octave sign, the slurs fall on the stave). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 356-358
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |