



b. 358
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 359-360
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 360
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text we reproduce the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 360-363
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic L.H. fingering added by EE in bars 360 and 362-363. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 360
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The range of the slur A raises doubts. While the end of the slur can be safely regarded as imprecise, the moment of its beginning is not clear, if we take into account the notation of bars 10, 12 or 193. For this reason, we consider two possibilities probable, of which we propose a whole-bar slur for the main text, because the situation in neither this nor the following bars is fully analogous to the aforementioned bars of the main theme of the finale, and it is not certain whether Chopin wanted to suggest here the separation of the initial octave (cf. the similar-looking slur in bar 362, in which the texture does not suggest separation). This is also how it was reproduced in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |