



b. 725-731
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing dashes marking the range of cresc. are an inaccuracy of FE (→EE) and GE1. Omission of such dashes is a quite frequent discretion of Chopinesque first editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 726
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
An earlier pedal change in FC (→GE) is a result of inaccuracy of the copyist, who probably considered the notation of A to be inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
|||
b. 730
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A one can see that Chopin started writing the g quaver as a category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Enharmonic corrections |
|||
b. 730-731
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A the R.H. quavers in these bars are written later than the L.H. part notation indicates, which is one of the reasons hampering the interpretation of the pedalling markings. The category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC , Inaccuracies in A |
|||
b. 730-731
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we keep the slur of FC (→GE), yet it is uncertain whether it was added by Chopin. Anyway, the missing slur in A is probably just an oversight (of Chopin), so it seems justified to add that slur, even if it was added by Fontana. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FC |