



b. 227
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The lack of accent is probably a mistake by the engraver of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 228-230
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we do not include the inauthentic fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 228
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The version of the sources, in which both the second and the last quaver feature d2 (without any accidental), is almost certainly due to Chopin's oversight, who, after writing a category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A |
||||||||
b. 228
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||||
b. 229
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In A the d1 notehead in the 2nd L.H. quaver does not align with g and f1 (vertically) and is not adjacent to this quaver's stem. Perhaps this is why it is absent in GE (→FE,EE,IE). The regular nature of this chordal sequence makes a very strong case for the presence of this note (cf. also bars 71-72). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A |